| |
Fun with statistics |
| |
nunfetishist (16:37 9/8/2010)
flibble (19:42 9/8/2010)
nunfetishist (00:54 4/11/2010)
Stoppers (08:09 4/11/2010)
nunfetishist (09:26 4/11/2010)
filecore (09:46 4/11/2010)
nunfetishist (10:38 4/11/2010)
Stoppers (18:50 4/11/2010)
CJE (12:14 5/11/2010)
nunfetishist (12:33 5/11/2010)
CJE (13:27 5/11/2010)
nunfetishist (13:53 5/11/2010)
epistaxsis (17:45 5/11/2010)
|
| |
|
Rob Kendrick |
Message #114957, posted by nunfetishist at 16:37, 9/8/2010 |
 Today's phish is trout a la creme.
Posts: 525
|
https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AtNLzfASDbL3dEZLQjVWRmZjY1VPa0prSFlHclUxOUE&hl=en
Note that there are multiple sheets. Corrections and insights are welcome. |
| |
 [ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Peter Howkins |
Message #114960, posted by flibble at 19:42, 9/8/2010, in reply to message #114957 |
Posts: 892
|
It should probably be stated that the 'years' in the first sheet are the reporting year, e.g. 2000 is Jan 1999 to Jan 2000. So it appears off by 11 months ... |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Rob Kendrick |
Message #115803, posted by nunfetishist at 00:54, 4/11/2010, in reply to message #114957 |
Today's phish is trout a la creme.
Posts: 525
|
This spreadsheet has been updated with the most recent accounts, made available today. ROL's profit and loss is positive! OMG! They do seem to have a hugely valued "stock" though. One assumes this is a bunch of pre-burnt CD-Rs of Select. It also looks like it's the largest profit they've ever made. One assumes this is due to spending next to nothing on development, and still stinging customers. Regardless, the over-all trends spell terror.
(The pretty graphs and such probably only work in modern, standards-compliant browsers.) |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Simon Willcocks |
Message #115804, posted by Stoppers at 08:09, 4/11/2010, in reply to message #115803 |
Member
Posts: 302
|
(The pretty graphs and such probably only work in modern, standards-compliant browsers.) They're very pretty.
About the news group activity; presumably that's general activity on the news groups, not specific to ROL? Otherwise, we were talking about ROL in 1991.
Could you do the same for, say, Acorn and Castle? |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Rob Kendrick |
Message #115805, posted by nunfetishist at 09:26, 4/11/2010, in reply to message #115804 |
Today's phish is trout a la creme.
Posts: 525
|
About the news group activity; presumably that's general activity on the news groups, not specific to ROL? Otherwise, we were talking about ROL in 1991. Yes.Could you do the same for, say, Acorn and Castle? If you have the data. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Jason Togneri |
Message #115806, posted by filecore at 09:46, 4/11/2010, in reply to message #115805 |
Posts: 3868
|
Am I the only one who laughed at the name "Wilhemina Tertass-smit"? |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Rob Kendrick |
Message #115807, posted by nunfetishist at 10:38, 4/11/2010, in reply to message #115806 |
Today's phish is trout a la creme.
Posts: 525
|
Am I the only one who laughed at the name "Wilhemina Tertass-smit"? No  |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Simon Willcocks |
Message #115809, posted by Stoppers at 18:50, 4/11/2010, in reply to message #114957 |
Member
Posts: 302
|
Does anyone know why Pace only took a 19.9% share in ROL and not a round 20%? I think I was told that some law or (accounting?) regulation or something kicked in at that point. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Chris Evans |
Message #115812, posted by CJE at 12:14, 5/11/2010, in reply to message #115809 |
CJE Micros chap
Posts: 228
|
The accounts of companies that another company has a Holding of 20% or more in, are required to be included in their own accounts. So a lot simpler if it can be avoided. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Rob Kendrick |
Message #115813, posted by nunfetishist at 12:33, 5/11/2010, in reply to message #115812 |
Today's phish is trout a la creme.
Posts: 525
|
The accounts of companies that another company has a Holding of 20% or more in, are required to be included in their own accounts. So a lot simpler if it can be avoided. One assumes that Castle Technology Ltd. must include ROL's accounts in their own, then? Might be interesting to get hold of that data. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Chris Evans |
Message #115814, posted by CJE at 13:27, 5/11/2010, in reply to message #115813 |
CJE Micros chap
Posts: 228
|
It might only apply to PLC's. Last time I heard CTL's accounts were late! |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Rob Kendrick |
Message #115815, posted by nunfetishist at 13:53, 5/11/2010, in reply to message #115814 |
Today's phish is trout a la creme.
Posts: 525
|
It might only apply to PLC's. Last time I heard CTL's accounts were late! Something ROL appear to be frequently guilty of that, too. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
keith dunlop |
Message #115816, posted by epistaxsis at 17:45, 5/11/2010, in reply to message #115815 |
Posts: 159
|
It might only apply to PLC's. Last time I heard CTL's accounts were late! Something ROL appear to be frequently guilty of that, too.
Of course CJE's accounts are full and have everything in stock 
(sorry couldn't resist! ) |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
